Skip to main content

Group Two #3

This week we got quite busy working on the rough cut of our film. We worked out a way around our different schedules and different time zones and planned out the technicalities, then went out to film details in urban design of Chicago and Brno that seem hostile or uninviting. Going location scouting and filming, we explored how we felt in those areas, which brought us one step closer to our theme. The rough cut left us all excited and motivated, as it reflected nicely the direction we wanted to move in. Looking forward, we will now be discussing the cut and how we want to polish it, and applying the feedback we will soon receive in class. After settling on the next steps, we will plan them out, from now on also counting in the change in daylight savings in the US. This proccess should take us to the final edit, presented in next week’s class.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Group Five #2

This week, we met again on Thursday morning/at noon. Our discussion followed a structure similar to last week’s, mainly focusing on our experiences with traveling and how we think about the concept of belonging. We discussed where we are from, what memories do these places hold and how they compare to where we study. We touched on the idea that both Brno and Chicago are cities with strong identities. We all shared stories about the places where we felt like home even though it was only for a short period of time. Especially memorable was Stevie’s short stay in New Zealand, Auckland. Although we focused mainly on the good sides, both Stevie and Peter mentioned a few places that made them partially disappointed, mainly by not being able to connect with people. We all eventually agreed that the feeling of “belonging somewhere” is very closely tied to the people you talk with and the community you create or are part of and that it's important to have a home base to return to. Then we...
Post a Comment
Read more

Group Two #2

This week, the five of us nailed down our concept for our project. We want to explore the ways that architecture and urban planning/design imply who is and is not welcome in a space – even if that space is a completely public one. Benches that you can’t comfortably stay on, indoor bus stops that are only open certain hours, ramps that are too steep, all of these details contribute to messaging about who belongs where. Inaccessibility and anti-homeless ideology are global problems in urban planning, and we want to explore that in our project. We met up to talk about how we want the project to look and sound, and since this is an experimental project, we want to delve into smaller visual details. We can use archival sound to highlight the dissonance between an object or building’s intended purpose vs. the new purpose it is given by being made inaccessible to certain groups of people. Since footage will need to be captured in both Chicago and Brno, we want to play with how we can mix thos...
Post a Comment
Read more

Group One #2

This week our team came together creatively to collaborate and finalize our idea for our project. We solidified the idea of exploring home and belonging through questioning how these factors can be constructed and weaponized. For example, when does protection become an exclusion? Why does removal feel like tidying up? When a nation imagines itself as a home, the language of protection and belonging begins to shape who is welcomed inside, and who is asked to leave. Since we are sharing these ideas from two different countries, it opened up a conversation about the similarities between our countries and the struggles that people who are labeled "outsiders" face. Using these comparisons, we came up with ideas on what shots to get to elevate our main idea. Our group has a great variety of skills, so we are able to take on these topics and even explore media in other languages like Czech and Spanish. We met outside of class on Sunday to talk about the types of media we would all ...
Post a Comment
Read more